Descriptive ‘Conclusion’
Created dichotomies are supposed and wished, but also mean competition; ‘wrong-,’ choice ones usually get corrected, or are ‘relearned,’ but some are retained obsessively. They are the traditions, with names; often of territories, ‘homes’ and places, or ‘local’ heroes or ‘icons.’ They are also our childish and gossipy ‘figurations’ and can be collected in larger, more abstract ones, like sports clubs, nation-states or religions. These dichotomies carry a negative or positive valuation, i.e.:praise/blame, idylle/scandal, alive/dead, love/ hate, white/ black (skin),left or woke/ right, huge/ tiny, abstract/nitty-gritty, digital/analog,hard-working/lazy, open/closed, wow/disgust, hairy/bald, ugly/beautiful(‘sexy’), awed/derised, +winner/loser, ‘sport’/addict, icon/ nobody,‘on-top’/hurt, green/red, black/white, expensive/ cheap, classy/dog,honored/despised, decent/ shabby, right/wrong, in-/credible, wicked/boring,respected/loathed, genuine/fake (markers),‘dis-/obeyed’ (marker-valuation),reticent/ gung-ho, compliant/maverick, introvert/extravert, un-/tidy,mighty/humble, rebel/softy, victim/winner and fe-/male, all closely associatedwith ‘self-esteem.’ They are perceived as the outspoken rules and markers, often ambivalent and extreme in valuation, in a constant struggle, when gossiped, even if we do know better, there is probable acception!
These conditional symbolic markers, for other dichotomic figurations/bubbles, which are adopted and ‘pimped’ by ourselves, sometimes only pretending to be ‘established,’ or ‘respected:’ Essential for wannabees or how one looks, to others.
More over, by associating a negatively pimped dichotomy to another more positive one, or vice versa, it is possible, if pimped enough, to assign or swap the second valuation for the first in the supposed ‘general’ perception or ‘narrative.’ A ‘bad’ figuration for a good one or not unknown one, orgiving a good (-enough-) one a ‘bad’ name, while raising the stakes for anothers ‘own’ assumed figuration-standard, pride or status.
It is perceived as ‘rule of law,’ by many and a way to exert power over and to ‘discipline’ others, debunk,‘throw them out,’ or to‘keep them within’ and to promote one in/of ones figuration.
By default we’re always biased when part of a figurated ‘bubble.’ With the conditional nick-name, we use our ‘gut-feeling,’ which is kept ‘unconscious’ or ‘secret’, even denied and not said aloud, but demonstrated and communicated clearly nonetheless by pouts (There are so many,it’s a language in itself, either ‘open’ or ‘closed’), always sympathetic and nods, winks, frowns, cackles, growls, nudges, gesticulations, pointing (=no),hand-waving, shrugs, ‘kicks’, ‘rolls’ and of hands-in the air, thumbing noses, gasping, just looking at, scratching, rolling eyes, to breathe-talk, smile(anticipated glory or threat), bow, shake, pirouette, crooked pouting, showing off the size of something and making a humble or victorious impression accordingly; and all the gutterals mentioned on p.18. Women, again mostly, butal ways denied, and men too, that usually do not have a clue. People depend emotionally on conditional obsessions in the long-term.‘Owned bubbles’ are considered ‘life-savers,’ keepers of competition-parties, our strength and ‘togetherness,’ and are also our ‘tools’ for ‘clever’ communicators,‘snitches’ and manipulators. We are so suggestible along these ‘scopes,’ which are usually no more than a handful of loyally kept dichotomy-theories with their ‘added value(s),’ like The Ten Commandments.’ Only when dealing with M.D.-s or lawyers and maybe some hobby-figurations and, last but not least: lover-pairs(‘hypnosis is a group of two’ /S. Freud/ ’21-2), these ‘rules-of-thumb’ can get legion and complicated. But it’s only a handful in most (figurated) bubbles.The tradition-factor keeps them simple enough to oversee.